2face and Annie Idibia, have been dragged to court
by a certain photographer, Mr. Emmanuel Okolo after he filed a N120m
copyright infringement suit against them.
According to source,the photographer sued the couple and one Mr. Anthonio Anifite before Justice Mohammed Idris of a Federal High Court in Lagos.
He alleged that the defendants made use of some photographs he took at the traditional wedding
of Mr. and Mrs. Idibia in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State in 2013 without duly
attributing the works to him or acknowledging him contrary to an alleged
agreement.
The photographer,claimed that the defendants wrote
‘2faceonline.com’ across 148 out of the 355 high-resolution photographs
he took at the couple’s wedding and uploaded them on 2face’s official website, thereby denying him credit and referral opportunities.
He claimed that days after the wedding, Annie
called him on the telephone requesting copies of the wedding photographs
and that upon sending them to her, Annie complained about the watermark
of Papilomenxy studios reflecting on them.
According to the photographer, Annie later sent the 2nd defendant to negotiate with the photographer on the terms that the photographs should be released without watermarks.
The photographer claimed to have then released 355
high-resolution photographs from the wedding to Anifite free of charge
on the agreement that whenever and wherever they were used, the
copyright would be credited to his company.
He, however, claimed that the defendants breached
the terms of the signed agreement and went ahead to write
‘2faceonline.com’ across 148 of the photographs that they uploaded on
2face’s official website.
The photographer, who described himself as “a certified film maker from the prestigious London Film Academy” and an holder of a Masters of Arts degree
from Cardiff School of Creative and Cultural Industries, South Wales,
United Kingdom, claimed to have suffered general and exemplary damages
for which he is seeking N120m compensation from 2face, Annie and
Anifite.
But the defendants have not only urged Justice Idris to dismiss the photographer’s suit but they also filed a counterclaim wherein they demanded N150m damages from him and his studio.
They claimed that the photographer crashed into the venue of their traditional wedding, took pictures and circulated same for commercial gains without their permission.
They claimed that he was not invited but was just
“one of the numerous photographers and pseudo-professionals and
artisans, who invaded the venue of the ceremonies to eke out a living
for themselves without prior consultation with or the consent of the
celebrants.”
They claimed that soon after their wedding, they noticed some strange versions of their wedding pictures circulating online with Papilonmexy studio watermark and after painstaking findings, they traced them to the photographer.
They claimed that upon locating the photographer
and expressing their displeasure, he pleaded with them while lamenting
that he was hard hit by a downturn in the still photography business and
sought any future engagement with them.
They claimed that the photographer forced the
photographs on them, saying he wanted to leverage on their popularity to
get referrals.
They, however, claimed that they told him categorically that the only
condition on which they could accept the photographs was for him to
remove the watermarks of his company, which he allegedly agreed to.”
Source:: dasort
Source:: dasort
No comments:
Post a Comment